#navbar-iframe{opacity:0.0;filter:alpha(Opacity=0)} #navbar-iframe:hover{opacity:1.0;filter:alpha(Opacity=100, FinishedOpacity=100)} Ed's Daily Rant: 10/01/2005 - 11/01/2005

Because face it.
I'm right, and you're wrong.

Thursday, October 27, 2005


Ben Affleck destroys everything he touches.

Coolest Halloween costume of 2005.

Yet another stupid viral video. None have the creative spark that was star wars kid. I post it here because I like the kid in the back who spends the whole time pwning his friends.

Since we’re all anxiously awaiting to open our Fitzmas presents, perhaps we can buy some Treason’s greetings merchandise in the meantime. Remember, the more you pray to baby Jesus and/or the FSM, the bigger the present on Fitzmas morning.

Tuesday, October 25, 2005

Twas the night before Fitzmas...

Wednesday, October 19, 2005

My Porn.

Print them out and give them away as presents.

Let us speculate about what the future may hold. After all when Nutbag Peggy Noonan was throwing out the idea that Clinton was being blackmailed by Castro, she darkly intoned, "Is it irresponsible to speculate? It is irresponsible not to.” So I can only assume Peggy will not only approve of my “speculation”, but engage in some of her own. Other wise she’d be a hypocrite.

Now granted my speculation will be grounded in facts and not wild eyed freeper fantasy land like Peggy’s, but I’ll give it the old college try. This was first brought to my attention by Talking Points Memo.

First we find out that Bush knew all about Karl Rove's role in leaking Valerie Plame's identity 2 years ago. He then went in front of the country and said he wants to “get to the bottom of it”. He ALREADY KNEW.

So the President is a lying scumbag. So what else is knew? Ahh, but remember, back when he was telling everyone he didn’t know who the leaker was, he was interviewed by special prosecutor Patrick Fitzgerald for over an hour. If the President told him that he did not know who as the leaker, he was lying. Now you might think “Oh, but he wasn’t under oath so its not a crime”. Well, you’d be wrong. If they find that he was deliberately lying to a federal prosecutor, he can be charged with obstruction of justice. That means Bush will be fingerprinted and his mugshot taken.

Will this happen? Probably not. But we all know it should.

Monday, October 10, 2005

Time Magazine quotes a White House aide:
"Fitzgerald's office, although very professional, has been very aggressive in pursuing people," the adviser said. "These guys are bullies, and they threaten you."

Pot meet kettle, Kettle meet pot.
What goes around comes around.
The can dish it out but can’t take it.

Insert your own metaphor in the comments.

Monday, October 03, 2005

A former FOX News correspondents tells us all what we already know.

He went on to recount his six-year tenure at Fox. "At the time I started at Fox, I thought, this is a great news organization to let me be very aggressive with a sitting president of the United States (Bill Clinton)," Shuster said. "I started having issues when others in the organization would take my carefully scripted and nuanced reporting and pull out bits and pieces to support their agenda on their shows.
"With the change of administration in Washington, I wanted to do the same kind of reporting, holding the (Bush) administration accountable, and that was not something that Fox was interested in doing," he said.
"Editorially, I had issues with story selection," Shuster went on. "But the bigger issue was that there wasn't a tradition or track record of honoring journalistic integrity. I found some reporters at Fox would cut corners or steal information from other sources or in some cases, just make things up. Management would either look the other way or just wouldn't care to take a closer look. I had serious issues with that."

Search WWW Search edsdailyrant.blogspot.com